MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320066065 · doi:10.1289/isee.2022.p-0746

Differential impact of environment on malaria due to control interventions in Uganda, 2010-2018

2022· article· en· W4320066065 on OpenAlexaff
Margaux L. Sadoine, Audrey Smargiassi, Ying Liu, Philippe Gachon, Guillaume Dueymes, Jane Frances Namuganga, Grant Dorsey, Michel Fournier, Bouchra Nasri, Kate Zinszer

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMalaria Research and Control
Canadian institutionsMontreal Police ServiceUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndoor residual sprayingMalariaEnvironmental scienceHumidityVegetation (pathology)Environmental healthToxicologyMedicineGeographyMeteorologyPlasmodium falciparumBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and aim Studies have estimated the impact of environment on malaria incidence although few have explored the differential impact due to vector control interventions. We aimed to evaluate the influence of temperature, rainfall, humidity, and vegetation, in presence or absence of long-lasting insecticide treated bednets (LLIN) and indoor residual spraying (IRS). Methods This study used weekly malaria cases from 2010 to 2018 from six health facility-based malaria surveillance in Uganda. Environmental variables were extracted from remote sensing sources and include enhanced vegetation index (MODIS), cumulative rainfall (ARC2), minimum and maximum temperature (ERA5), specific humidity (ERA5), averaged over different time periods (one to four months). Non-linearity of environmental variables was investigated, and general linear models based on a negative binomial distribution was used to explore the influence of ITN and LLIN on the malaria-environment relationship. Results A total of 204,252 malaria cases were laboratory confirmed and the median (range) weekly cases was 58.0 (0-597), rainfall 18.6 mm (0-129), minimum temperature 17.6˚C (12.3-24.2), maximum temperature 26.7˚C (20.1-34.8), and humidity 0.014 kg.kg (0.006-0.018). The best fit model was with the meteorological measures averaged over 3 months. All environmental variables showed a relatively linear pattern. Both IRS and LLIN were significantly associated with risk reduction (IRR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.36–0.42 ; IRR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.67–0.75, respectively). Marginal effects of environmental variables showed that joint effect of IRS and LLIN reduced the weekly predicted counts of malaria by 72.5% compared to no intervention. Conclusion LLIN and IRS both reduced the influence of environmental drivers of malaria and therefore morbidity in various transmission setting in Uganda. The benefits appeared to be greatest when the two interventions are used in combination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueISEE Conference AbstractsSame topicMalaria Research and ControlFrench-language works237,207