MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320071639 · doi:10.32674/cisr.v1i1.4876

Exploring Tensions in Decolonization of Internationalization of Higher Education

2022· article· en· W4320071639 on OpenAlexaff
Abu Arif, Punita Lumb, Milad Mohebali, Anushay Irfan Khan

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Internationalization Studies Review · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Educational Policies and Reforms
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of NewfoundlandUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecolonizationLiminalityInternationalizationNarrativeHigher educationInternationalization of Higher EducationSociologyInternational educationWork (physics)PedagogyPolitical scienceEpistemologyLinguisticsAnthropologyLawPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, we share our thoughts on how we arrived at decolonization in our research in internationalization of higher education. We offer our stories to explore the epistemological tensions we navigate in our work given the various liminal spaces we occupy in Western universities. We conclude this article by reflecting together on our narratives and posing five critical questions that we hope will invite our readers to reflect deeper alongside us about epistemic justice, decolonization and internationalization of higher education.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.275
GPT teacher head0.501
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical Internationalization Studies ReviewSame topicGlobal Educational Policies and ReformsFrench-language works237,207