MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320147679 · doi:10.1364/fio.2022.jw5a.80

Enhancing Data Security in Optical Fiber Communication Through Dual Layer Encryption with Randomized Phases

2022· article· en· W4320147679 on OpenAlexaff
Kh Arif Shahriar, Mostafa Khalil, Adrian Chan, Lawrence R. Chen, Randy Kuang, David V. Plant

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Optics + Laser Science 2022 (FIO, LS) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topicgraph theory and CDMA systems
Canadian institutionsQuantropi (Canada)McGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEncryptionComputer sciencePhysical layerDual layerModulation (music)Transmission (telecommunications)Optical fiberQuadrature amplitude modulationFiberLayer (electronics)Computer networkMaterials scienceTelecommunicationsBit error ratePhysicsWirelessChannel (broadcasting)NanotechnologyComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We experimentally demonstrate a novel encryption technique that implements physical layer security in optical fiber communication through two layers of phase randomization. 160 Gb/s transmission over 80 km of SMF is achieved with 16-QAM modulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Optics + Laser Science 2022 (FIO, LS)Same topicgraph theory and CDMA systemsFrench-language works237,207