THE SACCOS AND THE CRAZIER OF METROPOLITAN PLATO (LEVSHIN). MUSEUM ARTIFACT AS A REFLECTION OF CULTURAL-HISTORICAL EVENTS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bishop’s items from the vestry of Nikolaevsky Perervinsky monastery are considered as markers of artistic and social monastic milieu and as things reflecting the social-historical context of Russia in the second half of the 18th century. As a result of a complex attribution research of the saccos and the crozier, of studying unpublished monastic inventory and account books of the 18th - 19th centuries, it became possible to correlate the artifacts with the person of Metropolitan Plato (Levshin) of Moscow, with whom “the Golden age” of Perervinsky monastery is associated. Special attention is paid to the textiles of the saccos: a brocade damask with the pattern of “big hand” and cut velvet cross patterned. In Russian brocade weaving to the third quarter of the 18th century a special direction was formed - church weaving. Metropolitan Platon was the first to begin serving again in polystauri vestments, bringing ancient Byzantine traditions back to life. The production of cross textiles was resumed under Emperor Paul I, whose personality was greatly influenced by Metropolitan Plato.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".