Maternal pre-pregnancy BMI and gestational weight gain as risk factors of jaundice in healthy newborns ≥ 37 weeks of gestation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ENWEndNote BIBJabRef, Mendeley RISPapers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero AMA Domosud J, Kulik-Rechberger B. Maternal pre-pregnancy BMI and gestational weight gain as risk factors of jaundice in healthy newborns ≥ 37 weeks of gestation. Journal of Health Inequalities. 2022;8(2):137-144. doi:10.5114/jhi.2022.121530. APA Domosud, J., & Kulik-Rechberger, B. (2022). Maternal pre-pregnancy BMI and gestational weight gain as risk factors of jaundice in healthy newborns ≥ 37 weeks of gestation. Journal of Health Inequalities, 8(2), 137-144. https://doi.org/10.5114/jhi.2022.121530 Chicago Domosud, Justyna, and Beata Kulik-Rechberger. 2022. "Maternal pre-pregnancy BMI and gestational weight gain as risk factors of jaundice in healthy newborns ≥ 37 weeks of gestation". Journal of Health Inequalities 8 (2): 137-144. doi:10.5114/jhi.2022.121530. Harvard Domosud, J., and Kulik-Rechberger, B. (2022). Maternal pre-pregnancy BMI and gestational weight gain as risk factors of jaundice in healthy newborns ≥ 37 weeks of gestation. Journal of Health Inequalities, 8(2), pp.137-144. https://doi.org/10.5114/jhi.2022.121530 MLA Domosud, Justyna et al. "Maternal pre-pregnancy BMI and gestational weight gain as risk factors of jaundice in healthy newborns ≥ 37 weeks of gestation." Journal of Health Inequalities, vol. 8, no. 2, 2022, pp. 137-144. doi:10.5114/jhi.2022.121530. Vancouver Domosud J, Kulik-Rechberger B. Maternal pre-pregnancy BMI and gestational weight gain as risk factors of jaundice in healthy newborns ≥ 37 weeks of gestation. Journal of Health Inequalities. 2022;8(2):137-144. doi:10.5114/jhi.2022.121530.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".