MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320158042 · doi:10.15804/tner.22.68.2.09

Psychosocial Social Skills of Academic Teachers in the Context of Professional Training

2022· article· en· W4320158042 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Beata Pituła, Barbara Grzyb

Bibliographic record

VenueThe New Educational Review · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of SaskatchewanStryker
KeywordsPsychosocialMedical educationContext (archaeology)PsychologyProfessional developmentPedagogyMedicinePsychiatryGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article reports a fragment of studies into the psychosocial competencies of academic teachers at technical universities, which were carried out in 2019-2021 using a diagnostics survey done among the academic staffof the Silesian University of Technology. One of its aims was the self-assessment of those competencies that the respondents regarded as scarce, insufficient and incomplete, as these should be deemed a priority in the professional training of the academic staff. The results of those analyses have been presented here.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.107
GPT teacher head0.471
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe New Educational ReviewSame topicEducation and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207