MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320158709 · doi:10.32938/jep.v6i3.1190

Analisis Sektor Potensial Dalam Pengembangan Pembangunan Perekonomian Provinsi Gorontalo (Analysis of Potential Sectors in the Development of the Economic Development of Gorontalo Province)

2021· article· id· W4320158709 on OpenAlexaff
Agus Dwi Cahyono, Aisah Jumiati, Duwi Yunitasari

Bibliographic record

VenueEkopem Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan · 2021
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Growth and Fiscal Policies
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgricultural scienceBusinessForestryGeographyEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstrak Ketimpangan yang tinggi dibarengi dengan pembangunan yang meningkat di Provinsi Gorontalo. Hal tersebut tercermin dari Produk Domestik Regional Bruto (PDRB) yang meningkat dan didukung dengan laju pertumbuhan yang dicapai Provinsi Gorontalo jauh diatas laju pertumbuhan nasional. Sehingga terdapat indikasi manfaat pembangunan tidak dirasakan oleh seluruh lapisan masyarakat Provinsi Gorontalo. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi sektor-sektor ekonomi yang potensial dan berdaya saing untuk dapat dikembangkan pembangunannya sehingga dapat meningkatkan perekonomian serta membantu meminimalisir ketimpangan di Provinsi Gorontalo. Penelitian ini menggunakan data sekunder berupa PDRB Provinsi Gorontalo dan PDB Indonesia tahun 2010-2019, dengan alat analisis yang digunakan adalah Dynamic Location Quotinet (DLQ), Model Rasio Pertumbuhan (MRP), dan Skalogram. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan pada analisis DLQ terdapat 10 sektor ekonomi yang basis dimasa mendatang, pada analisis MRP terdapat 9 sektor ekonomi yang termasuk dalam kategori 2 artinya memiliki pertumbuhan yang menonjol pada wilayah studi dibanding dengan wilayah referensi, dan pada analisis Skalogram terdapat 4 sektor ekonomi yang dijadikan prioritas pengembangan pembangunan. Kata Kunci: Sektor Ekonomi, Basis Ekonomi, Daya Saing. Abstract High inequality has been accompained by increased development in Gorontalo Province. This is reflected in the increasing Gross Domestic Regional Product (GRDP) supported by the growth rate achieved by Gorontalo Province which is far above the national growth rate. So that there are indication that the benefits of development are not felt by all levels of society in Gorontalo Province. This study aims to identify potential and competitive economic sectors to be developed so that they can improve the economy and help minimize inequality in Gorontalo Province. This study uses secondary data in the form of GRDP of Gorontalo Province and Indonesian GDP in 2010-2019, with the analytical tools used are Dynamic Location Quotient (DLQ), Growth Ratio Model (MRP), and Skalogram. The results showed that in the DLQ analysis there were 10 economic sectors that were based in the future, in the MRP analysis there were 9 economic sectors which were include in category 2, meaning that they had prominent growth in the study area compared to the reference area, and in the analysis Skalogram there were 4 sector economic which made a development development priority. Keywords: Economic Sector, Economic Basis, Competitiveness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEkopem Jurnal Ekonomi PembangunanSame topicEconomic Growth and Fiscal PoliciesFrench-language works237,207