MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320179523 · doi:10.1016/j.atech.2023.100198

Comparison of the energy and exergy parameters in cantaloupe (Cucurbita maxima) drying using hot air

2023· article· en· W4320179523 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSmart Agricultural Technology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Drying and Modeling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCucurbita maximaMaximaExergyEnvironmental scienceAgricultural engineeringMaterials scienceProcess engineeringPulp and paper industryHorticultureMathematicsEngineeringBiologyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Drying is one of the common techniques for preserving agri-food product quality. However, for each product, the appropriate drying parameters should be identified to optimize drying quality and energy consumption. The present work aims to explore the performance of a hot air dryer (HAD) to dry cantaloupe (Cucurbita maxima) slices at three temperatures (50, 60, and 70 °C). The effects of drying temperature/duration on drying kinetics, energy, and exergy parameters of cantaloupe slices were investigated. The obtained data indicated a decrease in drying time and specific energy consumption (SEC) with temperature. On the other hand, the effective moisture diffusivity (Deff), energy utilization (EU), energy utilization ratio (EUR), exergy loss, exergy efficiency, exergetic improvement potential (EIP) and sustainability index (SI) increased with temperature. SEC, Deff, EU, EUR, exergy loss, exergy efficiency, EIP, and SI were in the range of 85.48–139.77 MJ/kg, 2.91 × 10−12–6.18 × 10−12 m2/s, 0.0207–0.0925 kJ/s, 0.1951- 0.8703, 0.0088–0.0447 kJ/s, 0.2839–0.9239, 0.0047–0.0117 kJ/s and 3.0880–3.8540, respectively. Moreover, adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems (ANFISs) and artificial neural networks (ANNs) were used as two state-of-the-art intelligent algorithms to predict the drying dynamics of cantaloupe slices in HAD and the performance of both methods was found to be reliable (R2 > 0.97). Indeed, ANFIS provided better performance for predicting energy utilization, energy utilization ratio, and exergy loss with R2 values of 0.9919, 0.9961, and 0.9939, respectively. On the other hand, ANN outperformed ANFIS in predicting exergy efficiency and moisture ratio by achieving an R2 value of 0.9999 for both parameters. The authors believe the outcomes of the present study can be used as a framework for choosing efficient drying parameters for drying cantaloupe or similar fruits in HAD systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.537
Threshold uncertainty score0.359

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it