Active Sound Power Attenuation with a Ring of Harmonic Acoustic Pneumatic Sources fOr Destructive Interference (RHAPSODI) and near field in-duct microphones
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Much research has been conducted to investigate active noise control of turbofans with loudspeakers as noise cancellation sources. However, the required power consumption, fragility, and weight and volume penalty make them unsuitable for engine nacelle applications. An alternative source technology, developed at Sherbrooke, is a harmonic acoustic pneumatic source (HAPS). They are mounted on a ring to perform multimodal active noise control in duct by destructive interference of primary noise (RHAPSODI). A dedicated MIMO harmonic control strategy based on complex envelopes is required to control the RHAPSODI with in-duct microphones located at a very close distance from it or with external in-duct microphones located 1 meter away from the duct mouth. During a training phase, active radiated power minimization is performed with the external microphones for different modal components of the primary harmonic noise. The optimal HAPS control and the optimal signals from the in-duct microphones are then used to tune the specific MIMO controller with a field compensation matrix close to the in-duct microphone signals. A typical result shows that RHAPSODI using 5 in-duct microphones and 5 HAPS can provide high attenuation of radiated sound power (22 dB-SPL, 1 kHz, primary sound power 130 dB).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".