Numerical modelling of acoustic metamaterial made of periodic Helmholtz resonator containing a damping material in the cavity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acoustic metamaterials are frequently used in many fields such as aerospace, buildings and ground transportation industries for low frequency noise control applications. Different solutions based on membrane or Helmholtz resonators have been investigated in the past few years. In the present study, a numerical design of acoustic metamaterial made of Helmholtz resonator with a membrane in its cavity is presented. The resonator with a neck extended into the cavity is periodically embedded within a porous material. The membrane inside the resonator cavity is modelled as a linear isotropic elastic material with free and fixed boundary conditions. The transmission loss (TL) of the proposed metamaterial design, predicted by finite element method presents multiple resonant peaks while only one peak is obtained with a conventional resonator. Two TL resonance peaks are observed when the membrane circumferential boundary is free inside the resonator cavity. For fixed boundary conditions, more than two resonance peaks are obtained. The proposed metamaterial design can therefore be used in many industrial applications for low frequency noise attenuation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".