MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320184596 · doi:10.3397/in_2022_0054

Modelling of acoustic metamaterial sound insulator using a transfer matrix method for aircraft cabin applications

2023· article· en· W4320184596 on OpenAlex
Zacharie Laly, Christopher Mechefske, Sebastian Ghinet, Charly T. Kone, Noureddine Atalla

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNOISE-CON proceedings · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAcoustic Wave Phenomena Research
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaQueen's UniversityUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFuselageTransfer matrixMetamaterialTransmission lossAcousticsSound transmission classTransfer-matrix method (optics)Helmholtz free energyResonatorFinite element methodMatrix (chemical analysis)Materials scienceSoundproofingPhysicsStructural engineeringEngineeringOpticsComputer scienceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The incorporation of acoustic metamaterials in the design of aircraft fuselage panels in order to reduce the low frequency noise inside the cabin is nowadays a major research subject in order to offer passengers a comfortable cabin environment. In this study, acoustic metamaterial made of Helmholtz resonators periodically embedded into a porous material is investigated using a transfer matrix approach combined with finite element calculations. This transfer matrix method is based on the two-load methods where the two loads in the numerical simulations are two different termination conditions (plane wave radiation and rigid wall) in order to retrieve the equivalent transfer matrix of the porous layer with embedded periodic Helmholtz resonators. The equivalent matrix is then coupled analytically in series with others analytical matrices to model complex multilayer metamaterials. The results of the transmission loss obtained exclusively using finite element method for single and double wall configurations are compared with the results of the proposed transfer matrix method and good agreements are obtained. It is observed that the frequency band of the transmission loss of the double wall configuration is larger than the one of the single wall configuration with higher transmission loss peak value. The investigated metamaterial can potentially be used in the design of aircraft cabin panels for low frequency noise reduction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.517
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it