MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320305528 · doi:10.52547/armaghanj.27.6.707

The Effect of Eight Weeks of Exercises Based on Prayer Movements on Pain and Endurance of Trunk Flexor and Extensor Muscles in Patients with Non-Specific Chronic Back Pain

2022· article· en· W4320305528 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
A Jokarborzabad, Zahra Karimi, P Yazdanpanah, N Roustaei, S Mohammadhossini

Bibliographic record

VenueArmaghane Danesh · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTrunkPhysical therapyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationFlexor musclesExtensor muscleBack painLow back painAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background & aim: Due to the high prevalence of chronic non-specific back pain and its effects on daily activities and people's lifestyle, it is important to study about new treatment perspectives and therapeutic exercises for this disease.Therefore, the aim of the present study was to determine and evaluate the effect of eight weeks of exercises.It was based on prayer movements on the amount of pain and endurance of trunk flexor and extensor muscles in patients with non-specific chronic back pain.Methods: The present semi-experimental study was conducted in 2019.the research population included all patients with non-specific chronic back pain referred to Shahid Muftah Clinic No. 1 in Yasuj, Iran.Sixty-six eligible patients were selected by non-probability sampling method and were divided into two groups based on random block allocation: test (33 people) and control (33 people).Two participants from the intervention group refused to participate in the study during the implementation of the intervention.For the patients of the test group, exercises based on prayer movements were performed 3 times a week for 8 weeks, and no training was given to the control group.From the demographic data collection form and the Quebec back pain disability questionnaire, the visual pain measurement scale, the 60-degree body support test and the Byring Sorensen test to collect data before the intervention and immediately after the intervention from the visual measurement scale Pain, one week after the intervention, the body maintenance test at a 60-degree angle and Sorensen bearings were used.The collected data were analyzed using t-paired, Man-Whitney, independent t, Wilcoxon, chi-score and Shapiro-Wilk statistical tests.Results: At the starting point of the study, there was no significant difference between the groups under study in terms of the amount of pain and endurance of the trunk muscles, except for the endurance of the extensor muscles (p<0.05).After the completion of the research intervention, a significant decrease in the amount of pain and a significant increase in the endurance of the trunk muscles were observed (p<0.05).Conclusion: According to the results of the present study, increasing the level of endurance of flexor muscles, trunk extensors and relieving pain and improving the level of performance in patients with nonspecific chronic back pain, it can be said that exercises based on prayer movements had an effect on the level of pain and endurance of trunk muscles in patients.Suffering from non-specific chronic back pain, it was effective.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArmaghane DaneshSame topicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationFrench-language works237,207