MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320305635 · doi:10.1353/rvs.2022.0032

Affective Geographies: Cervantes, Emotion, and the Literary Mediterranean by Paul Michael Johnson

2022· article· en· W4320305635 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Steven Wagschal

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de estudios hispánicos · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistory of Science and Medicine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDramaPassionsFeelingLiteraturePoetryHistorySociologyAestheticsArtPhilosophyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Affective Geographies: Cervantes, Emotion, and the Literary Mediterranean by Paul Michael Johnson Steven Wagschal Johnson, Paul Michael. Affective Geographies: Cervantes, Emotion, and the Literary Mediterranean. Toronto: U Toronto P, 2021. 328 pp. Affective Geographies: Cervantes, Emotion, and the Literary Mediterranean explores affectivity—broadly construed as affects, passions, emotions, feelings, and behaviors associated with these—in the works of Miguel de Cervantes as a way of understanding how early modern individuals made sense of the Mediterranean world they inhabited. Analyzing selected works of Cervantes’ prose, poetry, and drama, Paul Michael Johnson reveals how the complexity of emotions and their modes of expression are often central to interpreting important Cervantine passages or even entire works. Developing the ideas of Fernand Braudel, Johnson argues that the early modern Mediterranean World is a constructed space—an imagined community, to invoke Benedict Anderson, as Johnson does—and that one of its main modes of construction is the literary field. This leads to a greater claim that the Mediterranean World and affectivity in Cervantes’ works are not simply thematically related, but interdependent, bolstering the importance of studying and understanding each of these independently. Johnson’s engagement with affects and what he calls “the microliterary” is a turn away from a Braudelian “macrohistorical landscape” (5). By focusing on one single author who has had an unparalleled influence on later literature, Johnson argues that Cervantes’s work “not only reflects the historical conditions in which it was engendered but also plays a part in generating these very conditions” (5–6), thus impacting the construction of what we have come to understand as the early modern Mediterranean world and its recovery today. The book is divided into three sections of two chapters each that focus on different works by Cervantes as well as different emotions. In the first section, “Casting Off,” Johnson explains his view of affectivity and examines historical accounts centered in Spain’s early modern period as well as some contemporary theoretical notions of emotion in psychology and philosophy. Johnson then explores historical analyses of the Mediterranean and the construction of the literary Mediterranean. This section discusses a number of Cervantes’ narrative works and also some works of poetry and drama, mining these for both examinations of the intermingling of cultures and dialects so prevalent in Cervantes’ works and in the historical Mediterranean, as well as for Johnson’s view of “visual and corporeal grammar of affect” (38). In this way, Johnson indicates for the reader how he will argue throughout the book, that is, by subtly drawing attention to facial expressions and other bodily indicators of emotions such as sighing and crying that are mentioned in narrative. These indicators are so important according to Johnson that “[e]motions constitute the expressive precondition of the act of storytelling or writing itself ” (40). In Section Two, “Quixotic Passages,” Johnson turns to a specific discussion of Mediterranean honor versus shame through a novel and enlightening reading of Don Quixote’s encagement at the end of Part I as an example of shaming practices, and more particularly, to offer a nuanced reading of Don Quixote’s “characterological manifestations” of shame as an emotion. Arguing for the presence of shame, Johnson convincingly relies on “physiognomic qualities of shame” (74), such as [End Page 423] blushing, to reread this important and often studied episode. Following this, Johnson examines the importance of laughter in the Ricote episode, set against a nuanced and well-informed backdrop of the historical situation of the Moriscos in which he draws on secondary texts like Pedro Aznar Cardona’s account of the 1612 expulsion. Johnson compellingly adds much to the discussion and interpretation of the Ricote episode, demonstrating that “laughter encodes transculturation and modulates the seemingly less ambiguous feelings of maurophobia and maurophilia” (127). In Section Three, “Other Ports of Call,” Johnson explores in Chapter Five the emotion of wonder (and related phenomena such as awe and surprise) in La española inglesa (1613). Here, the author calls attention to the emotional aspects of admiratio and related concepts, in light of the lengthy critical history of studying admiratio within the framework of the Horatian dictum on exemplarity through aesthetic pleasure, as Johnson convincingly shows how a...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.365
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista de estudios hispánicosSame topicHistory of Science and MedicineFrench-language works237,207