MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320338715 · doi:10.29327/18593.1-4

GESTÃO DE CARREIRA UMA FERRAMENTA PARA O SUCESSO PROFISSIONAL: ESTUDO DE CASO COM OS COLABORADORES DO GRUPO CARVALHO, FILIAL BACABAL - MA.

2017· article· pt· W4320338715 on OpenAlexaff
Francisco de Sousa Lima Neto, Joélcio Braga de Sousa, Jose Ivo Fernandes de Oliveira, GILBERVAN SOARES DA SILVA, Marcus Vinicius Gomes Frota, Érica Rodrigues de Sousa

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAcademic Research in Diverse Fields
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyHumanitiesComputer scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anais Inovação, Tecnologia, Gestão e Sustentabilidade. (2447-8830) - Gestão De Carreira Uma Ferramenta Para O Sucesso Profissional: Estudo De Caso Com Os Colaboradores Do Grupo Carvalho, Filial Bacabal - Ma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.133
GPT teacher head0.442
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAcademic Research in Diverse FieldsFrench-language works237,207