El grado actual de armonización contable entre las legislaciones de España y Canadá: un caso basado en el análisis de los estados financieros de una pyme del sector vitivinícola
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar el grado de armonización contable internacional, a través de la comparación simulada del ciclo contable y el balance final de una misma empresa sometida a las regulaciones nacionales de España y Canadá. Partiendo de los mismos elementos patrimoniales y realizando las mismas operaciones, se aplican las regulaciones nacionales de ambos países para comparar, al final de un ciclo contable, el balance resultante. La compañía sometida a esta comparación es una bodega de tamaño medio, basada en la empresa real Bodegasmasquevinos, dedicada a la producción de vinos en Castilla-La Mancha. Una vez analizados los resultados de esta comparación, se concluye que ambas regulaciones, aun perteneciendo a entornos económicos muy diferentes y partiendo de regulaciones propias dispares, presentan en la actualidad un alto grado de armonización contable. Esta circunstancia es debida a la influencia de la normativa IFRS internacional, incorporada parcialmente en ambos países.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".