MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320486485 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.045006

Locally detecting UV cutoffs on a sphere with particle detectors

2023· article· en· W4320486485 on OpenAlexafffund
A.S. Shalabi, Laura J. Henderson, Robert B. Mann

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect
Canadian institutionsPerimeter InstituteUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAsian Office of Aerospace Research and Development
KeywordsPhysicsSpacetimeDetectorScalar fieldQuantum field theory in curved spacetimeUnruh effectField (mathematics)Scalar (mathematics)CutoffQuantum mechanicsClassical mechanicsQuantumOpticsQuantum gravityGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The potential breakdown of the notion of a metric at high energy scales could imply the existence of a fundamental minimal length scale below which distances cannot be resolved. One approach to realizing this minimum length scale is to construct a quantum field theory with a bandlimit on the field. We report on an investigation of the effects of imposing a bandlimit on a field on a curved and compact spacetime and how best to detect such a bandlimit if it exists. To achieve this operationally, we couple two Gaussian-smeared Unruh-DeWitt detectors to a scalar field on a ${S}^{2}\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}R$ spherical spacetime through delta switching. The bandlimit is implemented through a cutoff of the allowable angular momentum modes of the field. We observe that a number of features of single detector response in the spherical case are similar to those in flat spacetime, including the dependence on the geometry of the detector, and that smaller detectors couple more strongly to the field, leading to an optimal size for bandlimit detection. We find that in flat spacetime squeezed detectors are more sensitive to the bandlimit provided they are larger than the optimal size; however, in spherical spacetime the bandlimit itself determines if squeezing improves the sensitivity. We also explore setups with two detectors, noting that in the spherical case, due to its compact nature, there is a lack of dissipation of any perturbation to the field, which results in locally excited signals being refocused at the poles. Quite strikingly, this feature can be exploited to significantly improve bandlimit detection via field mediated signaling. Moreover, we find that squeezing on a sphere introduces extra anisotropies that could be exploited to amplify or weaken the response of the second detector.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.365 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.Same topicQuantum Electrodynamics and Casimir EffectFrench-language works237,207