MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320487114 · doi:10.1137/18m1233418

Inapproximability of Matrix \(\boldsymbol{p \rightarrow q}\) Norms

2023· article· en· W4320487114 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSIAM Journal on Computing · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComplexity and Algorithms in Graphs
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersSimons Institute for the Theory of Computing, University of California BerkeleyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMathematicsCombinatoricsHardness of approximationApproximation algorithmExponential time hypothesisMatrix (chemical analysis)Norm (philosophy)Matrix normExponential functionConstant (computer programming)Discrete mathematicsTime complexityComputer sciencePhysicsEigenvalues and eigenvectorsQuantum mechanicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

.We study the problem of computing the \(p\rightarrow q\) norm of a matrix \(A \in{\mathbb{R}}^{m \times n}\) , defined as \( \|A\|_{p\rightarrow q} \:= \max _{x \in{\mathbb{R}}^n \setminus \{0\}} \frac{\|Ax\|_{q}}{\|x\|_{p}}\) . This problem generalizes the spectral norm of a matrix ( \(p=q=2\) ) and the Grothendieck problem ( \(p=\infty\) , \(q=1\) ) and has been widely studied in various regimes. When \(p \geq q\) , the problem exhibits a dichotomy: constant factor approximation algorithms are known if \(2 \in{[q,p]}\) , and the problem is hard to approximate within almost polynomial factors when \(2 \notin{[q,p]}\) . The regime when \(p \lt q\) , known as hypercontractive norms, is particularly significant for various applications but much less well understood. The case with \(p=2\) and \(q \gt 2\) was studied by Barak et al. [Proceedings of the 44th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2012, pp. 307–326], who gave subexponential algorithms for a promise version of the problem (which captures small-set expansion) and also proved hardness of approximation results based on the exponential time hypothesis. However, no NP-hardness of approximation is known for these problems for any \(p \lt q\) . We prove the first NP-hardness result (under randomized reductions) for approximating hypercontractive norms. We show that for any \(1\lt p \lt q \lt \infty\) with \(2 \notin{[p,q]}\) , \(\|A\|_{p\rightarrow q}\) is hard to approximate within \(2^{O((\log n)^{1-\epsilon })}\) assuming \(\textrm{NP} \not \subseteq \textrm{BPTIME}(2^{(\log n)^{O(1)}})\) . En route to the above result, we also prove almost tight results for the case when \(p \geq q\) with \(2 \in{[q,p]}\) .Keywordsoperator normscontinuous optimizationinapproximabilityMSC codes689046

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.739
Threshold uncertainty score0.668

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it