PPICT: an integrated deep neural network for predicting inter-protein PTM cross-talk
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Post-translational modifications (PTMs) fine-tune various signaling pathways not only by the modification of a single residue, but also by the interplay of different modifications on residue pairs within or between proteins, defined as PTM cross-talk. As a challenging question, less attention has been given to PTM dynamics underlying cross-talk residue pairs and structural information underlying protein-protein interaction (PPI) graph, limiting the progress in this PTM functional research. Here we propose a novel integrated deep neural network PPICT (Predictor for PTM Inter-protein Cross-Talk), which predicts PTM cross-talk by combining protein sequence-structure-dynamics information and structural information for PPI graph. We find that cross-talk events preferentially occur among residues with high co-evolution and high potential in allosteric regulation. To make full use of the complex associations between protein evolutionary and biophysical features, and protein pair features, a heterogeneous feature combination net is introduced in the final prediction of PPICT. The comprehensive test results show that the proposed PPICT method significantly improves the prediction performance with an AUC value of 0.869, outperforming the existing state-of-the-art methods. Additionally, the PPICT method can capture the potential PTM cross-talks involved in the functional regulatory PTMs on modifying enzymes and their catalyzed PTM substrates. Therefore, PPICT represents an effective tool for identifying PTM cross-talk between proteins at the proteome level and highlights the hints for cross-talk between different signal pathways introduced by PTMs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".