MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320492970 · doi:10.3390/app13042370

Design of a Compact Planar Magnetic Levitation System with Wrench–Current Decoupling Enhancement

2023· article· en· W4320492970 on OpenAlexafffund
Chanuphon Trakarnchaiyo, Yang Wang, Mir Behrad Khamesee

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Sciences · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMagnetic Bearings and Levitation Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPlanarMagnetLevitationDecoupling (probability)Control theory (sociology)Computer scienceAcousticsPhysicsElectrical engineeringEngineeringControl engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Magnetic levitation technology has promising applications in modern manufacturing, especially for fine-motion stage and long-range omnidirectional planar motors. This paper presents the development of a compact planar maglev prototype with the potential to achieve both applications to increase flexibility for the manufacturing system. The planar stator is designed by using optimized square coils arranged in the zigzag configuration, which provides a better uniform magnetic flux density compared with another configuration. The stator is a compact and portable module with built-in current amplifier units. The single-disc magnet mover is deployed with five controllable degrees of freedom. The cross-coupling effect is decoupled by a precomputed Lorentz force based wrench—current transformation matrix stored in the lookup table. A 2-D linear interpolation is implemented to enhance decoupling effectiveness which is offered via discrete lookup data. Experiments with motion-tracking cameras and a basic controller demonstrate the results of fine step motion of 10 and 20 µm and rotation steps of 0.5 and 1.0 mrad. The potential for multidirectional material handling is represented by a total horizontal translation range of 20 mm by 20 mm with a maximum air gap of 26 mm and a total rotation range of 20 degrees for both roll and pitch.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.440
Threshold uncertainty score0.305

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied SciencesSame topicMagnetic Bearings and Levitation DynamicsFrench-language works237,207