MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320500566 · doi:10.2991/978-94-6463-042-8_186

Analyses of Factors Affecting Deaths Associated with COVID-19 in Ontario

2023· book-chapter· en· W4320500566 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jie Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in computer science research · 2023
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicCOVID-19 epidemiological studies
Canadian institutionsCanada Research ChairsUniversity of New BrunswickUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutoregressive integrated moving averageAffect (linguistics)Logistic regressionDemographyOutbreakStatisticCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)VaccinationMortality rateMedicineTime seriesGeographyStatisticsPsychologyDiseaseVirologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 in 2019, it has been a great challenge for the whole world.When the epidemic is serious and the vaccine will play a role, the statistic is an effective tool.It can help the government collect various data and conduct modelling analysis, so that it can face the actual situation and issue appropriate policies.This paper aims to analyse the factors that could affect the death rates among all COVID-19 confirmed cases in Ontario.Specifically, Seasonal ARIMA is used to fit past one-year data to predict short-term trend of confirmed case.An overall upward slope is predicted by selected time series model.Logistic regression is then used to determine how age group and vaccination could affect the mortality risk quantitatively.According to the information as of November 6, 2021, the forecast trend in the short term is expected to show an upward trend.In addition, age group and vaccination status significantly affect the probability of death of confirmed cases.The mortality increased with age.It has also been proved that the mortality of fully vaccinated patients is lower than that of partially vaccinated patients, followed by unvaccinated patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.111
Threshold uncertainty score0.223

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.673
GPT teacher head0.578
Teacher spread0.095 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in computer science researchSame topicCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesFrench-language works237,207