Some aspects of the state information policy of the modern state: definitions of the future
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is necessary to underline that all civilized states link their future with the formation of a single information space. The group of the most informationally developed countries - the USA, Canada, Japan, Germany, France, England, Italy, Poland considering the creation of a single information space one of the priority tasks of the 21st century, agreed to cooperate in creating a global information infrastructure based on seven fundamental principles. Information policy is the use of information as a means to achieve political and other goals, the information impact of political actors on each other. It should be noted that information is currently one of the most important resources in the public administration system. The purpose of the research is to analyze the specific features of the formation and the development of the state information policy. Searching identified 65 articles from 2015 to 2021. In the context of the state information policy of the modern state 13 were selected for review. The main methods used in the work were: comparative, method of abstraction, deductive method, concretization. The study described in this paper provides a systematic review of the literature on the formation of the informative policy and the specific features of the policy of different countries of the world over the past decade. Based on a full-text analysis of 13 articles published in renowned databases and peer-reviewed journals, the study reveals the necessity to analyze the importance of the state information policy in the modern society. The results state that is impossible to overestimate the importance of information in business as far as it creates fortunes for its owners, and the lack of information or its misinterpretation destroys large financial corporations. The conclusion is oriented on the facts that the information forms a system of alliances and blocs of states, contributes to the overthrow of governments, affects the political life of billions of people around the world.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".