Exposure to ultrafine particles and the incidence of asthma in children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Asthma is the most prevalent chronic respiratory disease in children. The role of ultrafine particles (UFPs) in the development of the disease remains unclear. We used a population-based birth cohort to evaluate the association between prenatal and childhood exposure to low levels of ambient UFPs and childhood-onset asthma. Methods: The cohort included all children born and residing in Montreal, Canada, between 2000 and 2015. Children were followed for asthma onset from birth until <13 years of age. Spatially resolved annual mean concentrations of ambient UFPs were estimated from a land use regression model. We assigned prenatal exposure according to the residential postal code at birth. We also considered current exposure during childhood accounting for time-varying residence location. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, sex, neighborhood material and social deprivation, calendar year, and coexposure to ambient nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and fine particles (PM2.5). Results: The cohort included 352,966 children, with 30,825 children developing asthma during follow-up. Mean prenatal and childhood UFP exposure were 24,706 particles/cm3 (interquartile range [IQR] = 3,785 particles/cm3) and 24,525 particles/cm3 (IQR = 3,427 particles/cm3), respectively. Both prenatal and childhood UFP exposure were not associated with childhood asthma onset in single pollutant models (HR per IQR increase of 0.99 [95% CI = 0.98, 1.00]). Estimates of association remained similar when adjusting for coexposure to ambient NO2 and PM2.5. Conclusion: In this population-based birth cohort, childhood asthma onset was not associated with prenatal or childhood exposure to low concentrations of UFPs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".