MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320512715 · doi:10.2991/978-2-494069-31-2_136

Exploring the Effect of Negotiation on UNCLOS

2022· book-chapter· en· W4320512715 on OpenAlexaff
Yifan Cai, Yi‐Rong Peng, Ziyuan Xu, Mingze Yuan

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research/Advances in social science, education and humanities research · 2022
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicInternational Maritime Law Issues
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnited Nations Convention on the Law of the SeaStalemateNegotiationConventionPolitical scienceOrder (exchange)Freedom of navigationLaw of the seaLawInternational tradeGeographyInternational lawBusinessPoliticsPublic international law

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article provides an in-depth discussion of the circumstances surrounding the establishment of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and looks at the role that negotiation skills played in its creation.This law was created at the time of the Third United Nations Conference on the Oceans and brought about a new order for the oceans, aimed at better managing and preserving the common oceans of mankind.During the negotiations, the stalemate between third world countries and developed countries over the delimitation of deep-sea mining and special economic zones brought to light the positions and deep concerns of both sides, and the negotiations on the basis of interests brought a way out of the situation.The success of the interest base negotiations and their impact on the Law of the Sea Convention will be analyzed in detail in this paper.As a result, the successful establishment of a maritime convention law has led to a more equitable maritime research ecology and curbed the tendency of developed countries to hegemonize the oceans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.793
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0100.028
Scholarly communication0.0010.005
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research/Advances in social science, education and humanities researchSame topicInternational Maritime Law IssuesFrench-language works237,207