L’importance des peuples autochtones et afro-descendants dans la construction de la notion de communauté en droit colombien
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cultural diversity is a characteristic feature of Colombia.Its entrenchment in the Constitution of 1991 was a decisive step towards the recognition of indigenous peoples and afro-descendants as communities deserving special protection.Such recognition is truly consequential in that, today, it is accepted that these communities are collective subjects with fundamental rights.Moreover the Colombian Constitutional Court has been careful to make clear that these fundamental rights are not equivalent to the individual rights that each member of the collective enjoys, stressing that these rights are not to be equated with the collective rights of other groups of people.This specific treatment granted to indigenous people and afro-descendants invites debate on the essential criteria that enable the characterization of a given community as well as the implications of recognizing such communities as legal entities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it