Varying hydrological response to climate change in three neighborhood plateau lake basins: Localized climate change feature matters
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Climate change and its impact on plateau lakes are of wide concern in China owing to their diverse yet fragile ecosystems. The three largest and most concerning plateau lakes (Dianchi, Erhai, and Fuxian lakes) in southwestern China were selected as case studies to demonstrate their different hydrological responses attributing to the local climatic and watershed characteristics. We processed 27 climate change scenarios according to the local climate characteristics and simulated the daily runoff of each lake basin under the historical and the 27 climate change scenarios. Then we analyzed the change of mean annual and seasonal runoff, and hydrological extremes of each lake basin. The results indicate a great risk of socio-economic and ecological for these plateau lakes as climate change will significantly alter the horological regimes of each lake basin. The mean annual runoff of the three lake basins will change from–65.24 to 54.17 %, when the air temperature increases by 1–2 °C and precipitation changes from –20 to + 20 %. Climatic and topographic heterogeneities caused each lake basin responded differently to climate change. Among them, the LFB was more sensitive to climate change than the LDB and LEB. Changes in the annual and seasonal runoff for the LFB were approximately 1.5-fold higher than that of the LDB and LEB. The hydrological extremes in the LFB also had the most significant changes. To cope with future climate change, each lake requires reasonable and effective mitigation measures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it