MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320522336 · doi:10.1117/12.2650841

An end-to-end adaptive neural network for process-aware snapshot compressive temporal imaging

2023· article· en· W4320522336 on OpenAlexaff
Miguel Márquez, Yingming Lai, Xianglei Liu, Cheng Jiang, Shian Zhang, Henry Argüello, Jinyang Liang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Optical Sensing Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSnapshot (computer storage)Artificial intelligenceCompressed sensingConvolutional neural networkRobustness (evolution)Computer visionData cubeIterative reconstructionShearing (physics)Deep learningPattern recognition (psychology)Data miningGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Learning-based compressed sensing algorithms are popularly used for recovering the underlying datacube of snapshot compressive temporal imaging (SCTI), which is a novel technique for recording temporal data in a single exposure. Despite providing fast processing and high reconstruction performance, most deep-learning approaches are merely considered a substitute for analytical-modeling-based reconstruction methods. In addition, these methods often presume the ideal behaviors of optical instruments neglecting any deviation in the encoding and shearing processes. Consequently, these approaches provide little feedback to evaluate SCTI’s hardware performance, which limits the quality and robustness of reconstruction. To overcome these limitations, we develop a new end-to-end convolutional neural network—termed the deep high-dimensional adaptive net (D-HAN)—that provides multi-faceted process-aware supervision to an SCTI system. The D-HAN includes three joint stages: four dense layers for shearing estimation, a set of parallel layers emulating the closed-form solution of SCTI’s inverse problem, and a U-net structure that works as a filtering step. In system design, the D-HAN optimizes the coded aperture and establishes SCTI’s sensing geometry. In image reconstruction, D-HAN senses the shearing operation and retrieves a three-dimensional scene. D-HAN-supervised SCTI is experimentally validated using compressed optical-streaking ultrahigh-speed photography to image the animation of a rotating spinner at an imaging speed of 20 thousand frames per second. The D-HAN is expected to improve the reliability and stability of a variety of snapshot compressive imaging systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.489
Threshold uncertainty score0.703

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Optical Sensing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207