MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Considerations for Advanced Heart Failure Consultation in Individuals With Fontan Circulation: Recommendations From ACTION

2023· review· en· W4320710307 on OpenAlexaff
Adam M. Lubert, Ari Cedars, Christopher S. Almond, Shahnawaz Amdani, Jennifer Conway, Joshua Friedland‐Little, Robert J. Gajarski, Steven J. Kindel, Angela Lorts, David L.S. Morales, Matthew J. O’Connor, David M. Peng, David N. Rosenthal, Lauren Smyth, David Sutcliffe, Kurt R. Schumacher

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation Heart Failure · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsStollery Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHeart failureReferralCardiologyInternal medicineIntensive care medicineFamily medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Individuals with Fontan circulation are at risk of late mortality from both cardiac and noncardiac causes. Despite the known risk of mortality, referral indications for advanced heart failure care vary between centers, and many individuals die from Fontan circulation-related complications either after late consideration for advanced heart failure therapies or having never seen a heart failure specialist. There is a critical need for guidelines to direct appropriately timed referral for advanced heart failure consultation. The Advanced Cardiac Therapies Improving Outcomes Network (ACTION) Fontan Committee has developed recommended thresholds for advanced heart failure referral to guide primary cardiologists. These recommendations are divided into 4 categories of clinical Fontan circulatory dysfunction including (1) cardiac/systemic ventricular dysfunction, (2) Fontan pathway dysfunction, (3) lymphatic dysfunction, and (4) extracardiac dysfunction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.786
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation Heart FailureSame topicCongenital Heart Disease StudiesFrench-language works237,207