Double-Layer Energy Management for Multi-Motor Electric Vehicles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes a double-layer energy management system (EMS) for electric vehicles driven by multiple permanent magnet synchronous motors. The system minimizes energy consumption and ensures safe longitudinal motion. The inner-layer distributes torques and flux currents by minimizing the motor input power. The outer-layer generates the total torque command by controlling the aggregated motor speed via a disturbance observer-based controller. A design condition that sufficiently guarantees the system's L <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> stability is presented. The condition is independent of the torque distribution ratios and can be checked conveniently via passivity notation without linearizing the total system. Various validation tests were performed using a three-wheel recreational electric vehicle (EV) platform. The advantage of the double-layer EMS has been compared with several EMSs proposed recently in the literature. Critical testing scenarios were employed, including sharp change in road friction during high acceleration. Test results reveal that, regardless of such condition, the double-layer EMS can prevent the wheel slip, thereby significantly reducing energy consumption. The New European Driving Cycle test was also conducted to demonstrate the merit of simultaneously optimizing torque distribution ratios and motor flux-currents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".