MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4320723430 · doi:10.1101/2023.02.13.528352

Hyperpolarization-activated cation channels shape the spiking frequency preference of human cortical layer 5 pyramidal neurons

2023· preprint· en· W4320723430 on OpenAlexafffund
Happy Inibhunu, Homeira Moradi Chameh, Frances K. Skinner, Scott Rich, Taufik A. Valiante

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeural dynamics and brain function
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoOntario Brain InstituteUniversity Health Network
FundersKrembil FoundationUniversity of TorontoSavoy Foundation
KeywordsNeuroscienceIn silicoPremovement neuronal activityHyperpolarization (physics)Biological neural networkIon channelHuman brainAfterhyperpolarizationNerve netElectrophysiologyBiologyPhysicsNuclear magnetic resonanceReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Discerning the contribution of specific ionic currents to complex neuronal dynamics is a difficult, but important, task. This challenge is exacerbated in the human setting, although the widely-characterized uniqueness of the human brain as compared to preclinical models necessitates the direct study of human neurons. Neuronal spiking frequency preference is of particular interest given its role in rhythm generation and signal transmission in cortical circuits. Here, we combine the frequency-dependent gain (FDG), a measure of spiking frequency preference, and novel in silico analyses to dissect the contributions of individual ionic currents to key FDG features of human L5 neurons. We confirm that a contemporary model of such a neuron, primarily constrained to capture subthreshold activity driven by the hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide gated (h-) current, replicates key features of the in vitro FDG both with and without h-current activity. With the model confirmed as a viable approximation of the biophysical features of interest, we applied new analysis techniques to quantify the activity of each modeled ionic current in the moments prior to spiking, revealing unique dynamics of the h-current. These findings motivated patch-clamp recordings in analogous rodent neurons to characterize their FDG, which confirmed that a biophysically-detailed model of these neurons captures key inter-species differences in the FDG. These differences are correlated with distinct contributions of the h-current to neuronal activity. Together, this interdisciplinary and multi-species study provides new insights directly relating the dynamics of the h-current to neuronal spiking frequency preference in human L5 neurons. Significance Statement Understanding the contributions of individual ionic currents to neuronal activity is vital, considering the established role of ion channel modifications in neuropsychiatric conditions. We combine in vitro characterization of the spiking frequency preference of human L5 cortical pyramidal neurons via the frequency-dependent gain (FDG) with new analyses of a biophysically-detailed computational model of such a neuron to delineate the connection between the dynamics of the hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide gated (h-) current prior to spiking and key properties of the FDG. By further determining that both these FDG properties and h-current dynamics are distinct in analogous rodent neurons, we provide convincing evidence for the key role of the h-current in the frequency preference of human L5 cortical neurons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicNeural dynamics and brain function→French-language works237,207→