MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320731084 · doi:10.4000/adsc.1570

Les pratiques de formation à l’enseignement des mathématiques : une approche par la recherche en didactique

2023· article· en· W4320731084 on OpenAlexaff
Frédérick Tempier, Caroline Lajoie, Valentina Celi

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales de didactique et de sciences cognitives · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrainerPedagogyVariety (cybernetics)Mathematics educationSociologyProfessional developmentPsychologyHumanitiesPhilosophyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While research in mathematics education has invested many questions related to teacher training, the role of the teacher trainer remains little developed. It is a matter of questioning the trainer's practices, the possible effects on the professional development of the trainees, the knowledge or conceptions that he/she mobilizes, the constraints he/she is confronted with, his/her interactions with other actors, etc. This thematic issue brings together original studies using a variety of approaches that reflect emerging issues and mobilize various theoretical and methodological tools, with the aim of contributing to the development of this field of research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.026
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.174
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0260.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.553
GPT teacher head0.552
Teacher spread0.001 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales de didactique et de sciences cognitivesSame topicEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingFrench-language works237,207