Cooperative super-enhancer inactivation caused by heterozygous loss of CREBBP and KMT2D skews B cell fate decisions and yields T cell-depleted lymphomas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Mutations affecting enhancer chromatin regulators CREBBP and KMT2D are highly co-occurrent in germinal center (GC)-derived lymphomas and other tumors, even though regulating similar pathways. Herein, we report that combined haploinsufficiency of Crebbp and Kmt2d (C+K) indeed accelerated lymphomagenesis. C+K haploinsufficiency induced GC hyperplasia by altering cell fate decisions, skewing B cells away from memory and plasma cell differentiation. C+K deficiency particularly impaired enhancer activation for immune synapse genes involved in exiting the GC reaction. This effect was especially severe at super-enhancers for immunoregulatory and differentiation genes. Mechanistically, CREBBP and KMT2D formed a complex, were highly co-localized on chromatin, and were required for each-other’s stable recruitment to enhancers. Notably, C+K lymphomas in mice and humans manifested significantly reduced CD8 + T-cell abundance. Hence, deficiency of C+K cooperatively induced an immune evasive phenotype due at least in part to failure to activate key immune synapse super-enhancers, associated with altered immune cell fate decisions. SIGNIFICANCE Although CREBBP and KMT2D have similar enhancer regulatory functions, they are paradoxically co-mutated in lymphomas. We show that their combined loss causes specific disruption of super-enhancers driving immune synapse genes. Importantly, this leads to reduction of CD8 cells in lymphomas, linking super-enhancer function to immune surveillance, with implications for immunotherapy resistance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".