MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320737981 · doi:10.55377/jmtss.v3i2.5695

PERBANDINGAN ANALISIS DEBIT BANJIR MENGGUNAKAN HIDROGRAF SATUAN SINTETIS (HSS) SNYDER DAN NAKAYASU PADA SUNGAI KRUENG TRIPA

2022· article· id· W4320737981 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Media Teknik Sipil Samudra · 2022
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldComputer Science
TopicMultimedia Learning Systems
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsForestryGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sungai Krueng Tripa merupakan salah satu sungai yang melewati 2 lintasan Kab yakni Kab Gayo Lues di hulu sungai dan Kab Nagan Raya di hilir sungai. Luas DAS Krueng Tripa dengan bagian hilir di Desa Ujong Krueng sebesar 2.953,458 km2. Banjir sering terjadi di Desa Ujong Krueng akibat luapan dari Sungai Krueng Tripa dengan ketinggian mencapai 30-150 cm dengan periodik 4-6 kali dalam setahun. Tujuan studi ini yakni guna menganalisis besarnya debit banjir pada Sungai Krueng Tripa yang dilakukan dengan menghimpun data curah hujan serta peta topografi. Berlandaskan analisis hujan rencana periode ulang 2, 5, 10, 25, 50,dan 100 tahun menggunakan HSS Snyder yakni 3265,437 m3/dtk; 4438,160 m3/dtk; 5239,825 m3/dtk; 6280,393 m3/dtk; 7074,094 m3/dtk; 7887,613 m3/dtk. Sedangkan analisa debit banjir rencana memakai HSS Nakayasu periode ulang 2, 5, 10, 25, 50, dan 100 tahun adalah 3543,434 m3/dtk; 4870,081 m3/dtk; 5618,920 m3/dtk; 6558,960 m3/dtk; 7714,292 m3/dtk; 8458,272 m3/dtk. Pada penelitian ini HSS Nakayasu memperoleh debit banjir lebih besar dibandingkan dengan HSS Snyder.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.594
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0060.003
Research integrity0.0010.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it