MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Recent Advances in ANN-Based Methods for Yield-Driven Design of EM Structures

2022· article· en· W4320803106 on OpenAlexaff
Jianan Zhang, Qi‐Jun Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceYield (engineering)Artificial neural networkMicrowaveProcess (computing)Surrogate modelMonte Carlo methodComponent (thermodynamics)Engineering design processDesign processMathematical optimizationMachine learningEngineeringWork in processMathematicsMechanical engineeringMaterials scienceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The design of microwave passive components should take into account the tolerances in the manufacturing process. This makes yield estimation and yield-driven design optimization essential steps in electromagnetic (EM) simulation-based microwave component design. Brute-force methods based on Monte Carlo (MC) analyses are not computationally feasible in practice due to the demand for a large number of EM simulations. Artificial neural networks (ANNs) hold a great potential to address this challenge. This paper reviews recent advances in ANN-based methods for the yield-driven design of EM structures, including a neuro-TF surrogate-assisted yield estimation method and the corresponding yield optimization algorithm. These advanced approaches are demonstrated by two microwave examples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical MethodsFrench-language works237,207