MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320803832 · doi:10.3390/mol2net-08-13880

Identification of Natural Products with Potential Activity against <em>Leishmania amazonensis </em>using computational models and experimental corroboration

2022· article· en· W4320803832 on OpenAlexaff
Juan A. Castillo‐Garit, Naiví Flores-Balmaseda, Ailín Ramírez-Abreu, Lianet Monzote, Niurka Mollineda, Sergio Sifontes

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of MOL2NET'22, Conference on Molecular, Biomedical & Computational Sciences and Engineering, 8th ed. - MOL2NET: FROM MOLECULES TO NETWORKS · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDiverse Scientific Research Studies
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeishmaniaEnumerationIdentification (biology)Computational biologyLeishmaniasisMachine learningBiologyComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMathematicsParasite hostingImmunologyBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Leishmaniasis is one of the most important neglected tropical diseases according to the World Health Organization. The available drugs are expensive, not sufficiently effective, have serious cytotoxic effects and parasitic resistance has increased in the last years. In the present work, a virtual screening protocol was used to identify new natural compounds potentially active against Leishmania spp. using machine learning-based models. Three vegetable origin compounds were selected by using a multiclassifier composed by models developed with k-nearest neighbor, classification tree, Multilayer perceptron and Support Vector Machine; all these models for Leishmania amazonensis promastigote form were developed with WEKA software. The selected compounds showed in vitro activity against L. amazonensis (MHOM/BR/77/LTB0016) promastigotes with CI50 lower than 1 µg/mL using 96-well plates and resazurine fluorescence method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.237
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of MOL2NET'22, Conference on Molecular, Biomedical & Computational Sciences and Engineering, 8th ed. - MOL2NET: FROM MOLECULES TO NETWORKSSame topicDiverse Scientific Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207