MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4320804545 · doi:10.58902/tcnckhpt.v1i1.6

CURRENT SITUATION AND SOLUTIONS TO VIETNAM'S ECONOMIC RECOVERY AFTER THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

2022· article· en· W4320804545 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Thi Hay Nguyen

Bibliographic record

VenueTạp chí Nghiên cứu Khoa học và Phát triển · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCOVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Economic recoveryPandemicBusinessGoods and services2019-20 coronavirus outbreakRecovery rateEconomyEconomicsDevelopment economicsGeographyMacroeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Assessing the recovery of Vietnam's economy, domestic and international experts said that Vietnam's economy is "resilient and recovering", gradually becoming a destination of interest for foreign investors. Evidence of the recovery of Vietnam's economy are economic indicators such as GDP growth rate, total retail sales of consumer goods and services, number of newly registered enterprises, production and business situation... of the first quarter of 2022 all increased compared to the first quarter of 2021. However, according to experts, Vietnam's economy has not yet maximized resource efficiency. The article mentions the recovery results of Vietnam's economy and solutions for Vietnam's economic development after the Covid-19 pandemic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.129

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTạp chí Nghiên cứu Khoa học và Phát triển→Same topicCOVID-19 Pandemic Impacts→French-language works237,207→