MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320806002 · doi:10.5539/jas.v5n11p246

Evaluation of Clean Milk Dairy Farming Practices and Advances in Murrah Buffalo Quality Milk Production Technologies

2013· article· en· W4320806002 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
O. P. Singh, A. K. S. Tomar, Ayushi Singh

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural Science · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLivestock Management and Performance Improvement
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIce calvingHerdAnimal scienceMurrah buffaloBiologyVeterinary medicineLactationMedicinePregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The opening balance (herd strength) of Murrah buffaloes as on 01/04/2012 was 150 heads (32 males and 118 females). In all, 38 animals were deleted from the herd due to various reasons, whereas 54 animals were aded due to new births. The new calvings were well distributed over all the months of year, except during April-May 2012 when no calvings took place. The male:female ratio of new calvings was 1.00:0.83. The closing balance of the buffalo and 38 males, the overall mortality was 3.45% (remale-2.11%, male-6.56%). The overall conception rate was 60.42% (heifer-47.05%, adults-67.74%). The overall calving abnormalities were 22.64%, which included 3.77% dystocia, 3.77% retention of placenta, 5.66% prolapse and 1.89% premature births and still births. The age of first calving, service period, dry period and calving interval were 39.69±2.82 months, 213.49±26.37 days, 232.93±21.36 days and 479.29±22.88 days, respectively.The overall live body weights (in kg) at birth 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months of age were 35.58± 0.53, 69.43±1.76, 126.63±3.57, 234.26±11.42, 334.62 ±8.98 and 377.93 kg, respectively. The respective values for females and males were 33.63±0.78, 69.96±2.46, 126.30±4.82, 233.53±13.84, 334.62±8.98 and 391.25±8.84 kg respectively; and 37.53±0.71, 68.91±2.52m 126.95±5.30 and 235.00±20.18 kg, respectively. The weight at first calving during the current year was 535.71±25.87 kg. Buffaloes produced 82098 kg milk. Overall wet and herd averages were 5.66 and 3.59 kg, respectively. On an average, 62.92% of the total adult females were in milk. The total lactation milk yield, average lactation length, average 305 days yield and peak yield were 2249.40±8.46 kg, 316.43±08.41 days, 2242.31±108.05 kg and 11.01±0.34 kg, respectively. The milk analysis of 872 samples revealed fat, SNF and total solids per cent as 7.88, 9.81 and 17.75, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural ScienceSame topicLivestock Management and Performance ImprovementFrench-language works237,207