MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320808006 · doi:10.1364/aoipm.1994.ncpdir.176

Forward and Inverse Calculations for Near-Infrared Imaging Using a Multigrid Finite Difference Method

2022· article· en· W4320808006 on OpenAlexaff
Brian W. Pogue, Michael S. Patterson

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Optical Imaging and Photon Migration · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityHamilton Regional Laboratory Medicine Program
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultigrid methodInverse problemFinite difference methodSimple (philosophy)InverseComputer scienceInfraredFinite differenceMedical imagingDiffusionComputer visionArtificial intelligenceOpticsMathematicsPhysicsPartial differential equationMathematical analysisGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A multigrid finite difference method for solving the diffusion is used to solve the forward optical imaging problem. Simulations of near-infrared imaging are presented for some simple test objects, using typical soft tissue interaction coefficients. The forward calculation used here may provide a fast method of reconstructing diagnostic optical images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score0.622

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Optical Imaging and Photon MigrationSame topicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207