MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Freedom of Expression, Democracy and Development

2009· article· en· W4320810813 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gaëtan Tremblay

Bibliographic record

VenueMedia Asia · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWorld Trade Organization Law
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemocracyPlenary sessionFreedom of expressionNew delhiPolitical scienceDisciplineLibrary scienceExpression (computer science)Session (web analytics)Media studiesPublic administrationSociologyHistoryLawAdvertisingComputer scienceHuman rightsBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Additional informationNotes on contributorsGaëtan TremblayGaëtan Tremblay has been Professor in Communication Studies at the University of Quebec in Montreal since 1974. He currently chairs a multi-disciplinary research centre on Brazil (CERB). He has been the co-founder of a research group on communication and cultural industries in the information society (GRICIS) and the first president elect of the Canadian Communication Association (in 1980).This paper was delivered in the plenary session, “Freedom of Expression, Democracy and Development” at AMIC’s 18th Annual Conference held on 15 July 2009 in Le Meridien Hotel, New Delhi, India.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.412
Threshold uncertainty score0.324

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedia AsiaSame topicWorld Trade Organization LawFrench-language works237,207