MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320857413 · doi:10.1007/s00439-023-02524-6

Beyond IBD: the genetics of other early-onset diarrhoeal disorders

2023· review· en· W4320857413 on OpenAlexaff
Lorraine Stallard, Iram Siddiqui, Aleixo M. Muise

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Genetics · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCeliac Disease Research and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick ChildrenSickKids Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyEnteropathyHuman geneticsPhenotypeGenotypeDiarrhoeal diseaseBioinformaticsImmunologyDiseaseGeneDiarrheaGeneticsPathologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diarrhoeal disorders in childhood extend beyond the inflammatory bowel diseases. Persistent and severe forms of diarrhoea can occur from birth and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. These disorders can affect not only the gastrointestinal tract but frequently have extraintestinal manifestations, immunodeficiencies and endocrinopathies. Genomic analysis has advanced our understanding of these conditions and has revealed precision-based treatment options such as potentially curative haematopoietic stem cell transplant. Although many new mutations have been discovered, there is frequently no clear genotype-phenotype correlation. The functional effects of gene mutations can be studied in model systems such as patient-derived organoids. This allows us to further characterise these disorders and advance our understanding of the pathophysiology of the intestinal mucosa. In this review, we will provide an up to date overview of genes involved in diarrhoeal disorders of early onset, particularly focussing on the more recently described gene defects associated with protein loosing enteropathy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman GeneticsSame topicCeliac Disease Research and ManagementFrench-language works237,207