MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320870237 · doi:10.4000/13vhy

Les « nains » de l’Internet sont-ils écologiques? Réflexions historico-environnementales sur les architectures de réseau décentralisées

2025· article· fr· W4320870237 on OpenAlex
Francesca Musiani

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTerminal · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSharing Economy and Platforms
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesGeographyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Depuis le début du numérique en tant qu’ensemble de technologies d’information et de communication, des individus et des communautés expérimentent avec des systèmes sous-tendus par des architectures techniques distribuées et décentralisées. Cet article propose un ensemble de réflexions sur la façon dont l’étude des dynamiques de décentralisation et de distribution sur Internet peut éclairer certains aspects du lien entre transition écologique et transition numérique. Symétriquement, l’article propose de réfléchir aux manières dont le prisme environnemental et écologique permet d’étudier sous un jour nouveau certaines facettes des implications sociales et économiques des architectures décentralisées et distribuées. L’article est nourri par des extraits d’enquêtes de terrain effectuées depuis 2009 et par une revue de littérature interdisciplinaire.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.715
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it