MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4320871717 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1808.02005

Theory of Confined High Tc Superconductivity in Monovalent Metals

2018· preprint· en· W4320871717 on OpenAlexfundno aff
G. Baskaran

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2018
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersScience and Engineering Research BoardInstitut Périmètre de physique théoriqueIndustry CanadaGovernment of CanadaPurdue University
KeywordsSuperconductivityCondensed matter physicsScatteringPhysicsElectronegativityFermi liquid theoryFermi levelFermi Gamma-ray Space TelescopeDopingMaterials scienceElectronQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Monovalent non-transition metals are robust Fermi liquids. They defy superconductivity even at lowest temperatures (Li is a minor exception:Tc $\approx$ 0.4 mK). However, Thapa and Pandey \cite{ThapaPandey} have recently reported signals for ambient temperature granular superconductivity in Ag nanoparticle embedded in Au matrix. We develop a theory, where competing superconducing, CDW and SDW orders lose and get confined (go off-shell). They leave behind a robust Fermi liquid on-shell. \textit{A single half filled band crossing the Fermi level} provides a number of special k-space regions for \textit{singlet stabilizing umklapp pair scattering and superconductivity stabilizing repulsive pair scattering}. Carefully designed perturbations could deconfine a confined superconductivity. We suggest that electron transfer (doping) from Ag nanoparticles to Au matrix (with a higher electronegativity), quasi 2d structural reconstructions (e.g., 9R structure) at Ag-Au interfaces etc., bring out confined superconductivity. Beneath a calm Fermi sea, strong supercurrents may exist in several metals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.123 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)→Same topicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism→French-language works237,207→