MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320890739 · doi:10.1002/rnc.6636

Adaptive fuzzy fixed‐time control for non‐triangular structural stochastic switching nonlinear systems

2023· article· en· W4320890739 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNatural Science Foundation of Zhejiang ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBacksteppingControl theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemLyapunov functionController (irrigation)Fuzzy logicTracking errorMathematicsAdaptive controlLyapunov redesignLyapunov stabilityFuzzy control systemComputer scienceControl (management)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this article, the problem of adaptive fixed‐time tracking control is addressed for non‐triangular structural stochastic switching nonlinear systems. Fuzzy logic systems are used to compensate for unknown nonlinearities, and in the meantime, to avoid the algebraic loop problem, which exists in traditional backstepping controller design processes for non‐triangular structural nonlinear systems. The unknown control gain problem is addressed by the construction of proper Lyapunov function candidates. By employing Lyapunov stability theorem, all the closed‐loop signals can be ensured to be semi‐globally practical fixed‐time stable, the output signal can track the desired signal, and the tracking error can converge to a small zone around the origin. The effectiveness of the developed control approach is verified through simulation results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.807
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it