MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320893937 · doi:10.7202/1096705ar

Le rire sonore de Dassoucy alias Diogène

2023· article· fr· W4320893937 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dominique Bertrand

Bibliographic record

VenueTopiques études satoriennes · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRenaissance Literature and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdventureLiteratureArtSign (mathematics)The RenaissanceAliasMusicalReading (process)HumanitiesArt historyPhilosophyLinguisticsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arborant un masque diogénique dans l’autofiction de ses Aventures, Dassoucy procède à une falsification des valeurs sociales qui contamine la topique musicale. Il se réapproprie ainsi la tradition facétieuse des conteurs de la Renaissance et de Rabelais pour en exacerber les virtualités satiriques et blasphématoires. Ces perspectives facétieuses mettent en place un dispositif de lecture fondée sur un jeu de connivence cryptée pour déconstruire la topique de l’harmonia mundi, voire substituer à la symbolique chrétienne des cloches le signe de reconnaissance cynique d’un rire aux résonances obscènes et blasphématoires.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.820
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTopiques études satoriennesSame topicRenaissance Literature and CultureFrench-language works237,207