Green Training and Development and Job Delight as Determinants of Green Employee Behavior and Employee Retention: An Empirical Study on Hotels and Tourism Corporations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Organizations, in general, have been emphasizing the green human resource management practices in the last two decades in order to change employees` attitudes and evoke their positive behaviors. Management can elicit employees` positive attitudes and behaviors through implementing green training and development, as one of the main human resources functions. The aim of this study was to explore the link between green training and development, green employee behavior, and employee retention. In addition, the study tried to assess the role of job delight as a mediating variable in the relationship between green training and development, green employee behavior, and employee retention. The study was conducted and collected data from 287 employees working with hotels and tourism corporations listed in Amman Stock Exchange in Jordan to assess the proposed relationships. Results showed that the relationships between green training and development, green employee behavior, and employee retention were positively significant. The study also found that job delight significantly contributed as a mediator in these relationships. Academic and managerial implications of these findings were discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it