MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320917006 · doi:10.18280/ijsdp.180135

Adoption of Mobile Internet and the Implication on Palm Oil Productivity: Case Study in Siak Regency

2023· article· en· W4320917006 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Arif Imam Suroso, Idqan Fahmi, Hansen Tandra

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAgricultural and Environmental Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDirektorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi
KeywordsPalm oilProductivityBusinessThe InternetAgricultural scienceComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceEconomicsEconomic growthWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mobile internet has already become an important technology due to the higher internet users and the several benefits of the adoption.However, the investigation on the adoption of mobile internet and the exploration of the internet adoption on palm oil productivity is relatively rare.This study aims to determine the factors influencing mobile internet adoption and its implication on the productivity of palm oil farmers.There are two techniques used to achieve the aim of this study, namely logistic regression and linear multiple regression.This research involved 119 palm oil farmers in Siak Regency.The result is that palm oil farmers' adoption of mobile internet is determined by education, training size, ease of use, and productivity.The mobile internet adoption has not significantly affected the productivity of palm oil farmers.This research only limited in mobile internet usage due to the higher of trend in this technology.Therefore, the further research could be applied by using another technology related on internet access.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.077

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and PlanningSame topicAgricultural and Environmental ManagementFrench-language works237,207