Environment and Social Framework: Compromise of Interest as Social Conflicts Resolution in Infrastructure Projects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research is a development from the previous studies that aimed to test the ability of the World Bank's Environment and Social Framework (ESF) in minimizing the impact of social conflict projects in the context of environmental and social protection.The study used samples from infrastructure projects in Indonesia sourced from the State Budget throughout 2018-2021.There were 120 respondents who participated in this study by filling out a questionnaire.Meanwhile, secondary data is obtained through indexes and official government data regarding the condition of local communities that reflect the level of interest.Using PLS-SEM method, the results of significant influence from ESF in minimizing the potential impact of social conflicts in the project were obtained.ESF can effectively become a "compromise of interest" for the project and the community.This study also proves the independence of ESF, where both interests are unable to affect the quality of ESF.This proves that the position of ESF as an effective legal tool in managing environmental and social impacts needs to be strengthened by firm regulation.The results of this study are expected to help further research in finding differences in project social conflict behavior based on cultural differences in Indonesia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".