PESANTREN RAMAH SANTRI, RESPONS MENCEGAH KEKERASAN DI PESANTREN
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kekerasan terhadap anak-anak dapat terjadi di mana pun, termasuk di lingkungan pesantren. Kekerasan terhadap anak umumnya dilakukan oleh oarng-orang terdekat. Dalam konteks kekerasan di pesantren, pelaku potensialnya bisa saja teman sebaya, senior, pengurus, guru, bahkan keluarga pengasuh pesantren. Tidak diseleksinya input santri, frekuensi kebersamaan yang kuat, dan relasi kuasa yang timpang dapat menjadi penyebab utama munculnya kekerasan terhadap santri. Menyusul maraknya kejadian kekerasan di pesantren, respons positif ditunjukkan oleh Griya Curhat Keluarga Dewan Pengurus Wilayah Perempuan Bangsa Jawa Timur bekerja sama dengan Robithoh Ma’ahid Islamiyah Nahdlatul Ulama Jawa Timur. Pesantren Ramah Santri adalah nama program kerjasama strategis ini. Konsentrasi utamanya adalah mengembangkan pesantren ramah anak dengan menggunakan resources yang dimiliki pesantren. Respons atas program ini sangat baik, setidaknya pada aspek peningkatan awareness pesantren terhadap isu ramah anak yang diterjemahkan melalui layanan yang lebih ramah terhadap santri.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.045 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".