MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320924120 · doi:10.5334/bc.275

Climate action at the neighbourhood scale: Comparing municipal future scenarios

2023· article· en· W4320924120 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueBuildings and Cities · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicNoise Effects and Management
Canadian institutionsEsri (Canada)University of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeighbourhood (mathematics)GeographyGreenhouse gasPopulationClimate changeEnvironmental planningEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental scienceSociologyDemographyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Municipalities face the direct impact of climate change events, but many are challenged to assess the potential outcomes of future climate action policies. It is essential for local municipalities to be able to evaluate cross-sector and cross-scale policy interventions, but many lack the expertise and resources for wholistic forecasting. This paper used a hybrid inter-scalar and interdisciplinary modeling approach to evaluate, compare, visualize, and reveal the performance of climate actions at building and neighbourhood scales of future ‘what-if’ scenarios for three neighbourhood urban form types (dispersed, corridor, nodal) in three cities in British Columbia, Canada (Vancouver, Victoria, Prince George). Results found that increases in population density combined with strict building standards and retrofitting older buildings decreased per person emissions per year by up to 84% by 2050. Within the neighbourhood-scale areas, building form and location had less impact. Population density and frequency of transit service were most important for mobility mode shifts. Concentrating density at transit nodes or along commercial corridors improved the percentages of residents within a five-minute walk of those services, but proximity to greenspaces showed mixed results. <em><strong>Policy relevance</strong></em> Municipal climate action policies cross sectors and scales. This analysis of future urban form and energy scenarios at neighbourhood scales reveals livability and greenhouse gas (GHG) outcomes. It provides evidence that compact neighbourhood form coupled with stringent building codes reduces GHG emissions. (1) Concentrating density at transit nodes or along commercial corridors improved the percentages of residents within a five-minute walk of those services, but proximity to greenspaces showed mixed results. (2) Within neighbourhood-scale areas urban form (building form and location) had less influence on shifting mobility modes than did overall population density and transit frequency. (3) British Columbia’s net-zero-ready building code, a performance-based code, resulted in notable energy-use reductions and related emissions reductions associated with the new building stock. (4) Retrofitting the existing building stock resulted in notable emissions reductions in the three neighbourhoods; however, for cities with growing high land value, the potential for sale and redevelopment is a disincentive to retrofitting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.175
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it