MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320924213 · doi:10.5334/joh.50

Geophysical Open Seismic Hardware: Design of a Vertical Seismic Profiling Instrument

2023· article· en· W4320924213 on OpenAlexaff
Arnaud Mercier, J. Christian Dupuis, Bernard Giroux

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Open Hardware · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysics and Sensor Technology
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModular designWirelineComputer scienceData acquisitionSoftware deploymentEmbedded systemComputer hardwareEngineeringTelecommunicationsWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Geophysics can help provide guidance as we adapt to our changing environment. However, with advent of microelectronics, embedded systems and field programmable gate arrays, geophysical instruments have largely become a black box for most users: experiments are limited by the budgets that are available rather than the imagination of the geoscientific community. The solution we propose is to introduce affordable, modular and lightweight multi-component seismic instruments that can be deployed easily by researchers and explorers alike. We have developed a system that allows seismic data acquisition using very sensitive and compact accelerometers. These sensors are coupled to high-speed, multi-channel 24-bit downhole acquisition modules that were developed for this project. The control and synchronization of the system is engineered around microcontrollers that are compatible with the Arduino ecosystem. Communication between the parts of the system is done via a novel frequency modulated RS-485 communication protocol. This protocol makes it possible to send power and data over a wireline with only two conductors. The small diameter and the low cost of this system facilitates the deployment of a large number of channels or in configurations that may not be feasible with commercial equipment. The modular nature of the system makes it easy to adapt to other downhole applications or for draggable sensor arrays on surface. We consider that these efforts will contribute to the democratization of seismic survey in exploration, civil engineering and water prospecting to help reduce the global environmental impacts of human activities. Metadata Overview Main design files: Geophysical Open Seismic Hardware, in Hardware and Firmware directories. Target group: Geoscientists and engineers. Skills required: 3D printing – easy; electronics – intermediate; Programming – intermediate. Replication: No builds known to the authors so far. See section “Build Details” for more detail.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.122

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Open HardwareSame topicGeophysics and Sensor TechnologyFrench-language works237,207