Oeuvre vivante, périssable, immuable ? La nourriture en arts visuels et son entrée dans le musée
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Matière vivante et périssable, la nourriture a permis à des artistes comme Massimo Guerrera et Zoe Leonard de donner – littéralement et symboliquement – vie à leurs oeuvres. Ici, la nourriture se fait objet d’échanges relationnels et métaphore de l’entropie de notre existence charnelle.L’autrice aborde le thème de l’alimentation en analysant des oeuvres où la nourriture constitue non seulement un matériau donnant corps à l’oeuvre d’art, mais aussi un outil de réflexion métaphorique sur la vie, la mort, le temps qui passe et la création d’affects. Elle interroge également les modalités d’exposition et de conservation de ce type d’oeuvre dans les musées, ainsi que les enjeux formels et conceptuels que cela peut soulever.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".